On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:36:51AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:11:47AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> Greg, > >> > >> I'm doing some cleanup on ath6kl now. I want to ensure that future > >> patches all address checkpatch.pl but this is pretty impossible if you > >> first do not address the major complaints from checkpatch.pl line the > >> spaces in the beginning of a line instead of spaces. I was thinking of > >> addressing that first, and then later removing the extra space between > >> call functions, so instead of foo () do foo(). And move up slow like > >> that until we have something more Linux stylish. Is this OK? I want to > >> get 2 patches out to you that you accept first. > > > > Whatever order you feel is better for you is fine with me. I don't mind > > checkpatch errors in patches that are doing cleanup when the error was > > there in the first place. > > > > My queue is empty for ath6kl patches at the moment, so feel free to base > > them off of linux-next. > > I'll base then off of origin/staging-next from > git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging-2.6.git , is > that OK too? Yes, that is fine. > I take it that your queue does have that patch I just > acked from Javier Martinez Canillas <martinez.javier@xxxxxxxxx> > though? Nope, as I just NAKed it :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
