Re: Subjective cleanup process - ath6kl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:11:47AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Greg,
> 
> I'm doing some cleanup on ath6kl now. I want to ensure that future
> patches all address checkpatch.pl but this is pretty impossible if you
> first do not address the major complaints from checkpatch.pl line the
> spaces in the beginning of a line instead of spaces. I was thinking of
> addressing that first, and then later removing the extra space between
> call functions, so instead of foo () do foo(). And move up slow like
> that until we have something more Linux stylish. Is this OK? I want to
> get 2 patches out to you that you accept first.

Whatever order you feel is better for you is fine with me.  I don't mind
checkpatch errors in patches that are doing cleanup when the error was
there in the first place.

My queue is empty for ath6kl patches at the moment, so feel free to base
them off of linux-next.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux