On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:11:47AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> Greg, >> >> I'm doing some cleanup on ath6kl now. I want to ensure that future >> patches all address checkpatch.pl but this is pretty impossible if you >> first do not address the major complaints from checkpatch.pl line the >> spaces in the beginning of a line instead of spaces. I was thinking of >> addressing that first, and then later removing the extra space between >> call functions, so instead of foo () do foo(). And move up slow like >> that until we have something more Linux stylish. Is this OK? I want to >> get 2 patches out to you that you accept first. > > Whatever order you feel is better for you is fine with me. ÂI don't mind > checkpatch errors in patches that are doing cleanup when the error was > there in the first place. > > My queue is empty for ath6kl patches at the moment, so feel free to base > them off of linux-next. I'll base then off of origin/staging-next from git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging-2.6.git , is that OK too? I take it that your queue does have that patch I just acked from Javier Martinez Canillas <martinez.javier@xxxxxxxxx> though? Luis _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
