On 05/16/2010 09:51 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 09:13:46PM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote: >> Hi Minchan, >> >> On 05/16/2010 09:50 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: >> >>> One thing was about naming. >>> Now block device operations has field naming swap_xxx_notify >>> (I am not sure exact name). My concern was it's very specific about swap. >>> So I thought we would be better to more abstract name. >>> >>> I thought trim like naming as Linus said. >> >> This call is very swap specific and is quite different from generic trim >> stuff. So, I think it will be better not be generalize the name and avoid >> confusing it with trim/discard etc. >> >>> >>> Anyway, I will review again at next week if it isn't merged >>> linux-next(or linux-mm ?? which is right?). That's because I have a >>> interest in your good ramzswap. :) >>> >> >> Thanks, comments/reviews are always welcome :) >> >> Greg: In the meantime, considering 3 Acks, is it possible to pull it in >> linux-next? > > It's already there, right? > Yuk! its there. I actually wanted to refer to the 'swap notify patch'. Please see patch titled: 'ramzswap: Eliminate stale data from compressed memory (v2)' (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/982232) This patch got 3 Acks: Pekka, Linus and Nigel. (Minchan, please always reply to the patch your are referring to) Thanks, Nitin _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
