On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:20:47PM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote: > On 05/16/2010 09:51 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 09:13:46PM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote: > >> Hi Minchan, > >> > >> On 05/16/2010 09:50 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > >> > >>> One thing was about naming. > >>> Now block device operations has field naming swap_xxx_notify > >>> (I am not sure exact name). My concern was it's very specific about swap. > >>> So I thought we would be better to more abstract name. > >>> > >>> I thought trim like naming as Linus said. > >> > >> This call is very swap specific and is quite different from generic trim > >> stuff. So, I think it will be better not be generalize the name and avoid > >> confusing it with trim/discard etc. > >> > >>> > >>> Anyway, I will review again at next week if it isn't merged > >>> linux-next(or linux-mm ?? which is right?). That's because I have a > >>> interest in your good ramzswap. :) > >>> > >> > >> Thanks, comments/reviews are always welcome :) > >> > >> Greg: In the meantime, considering 3 Acks, is it possible to pull it in > >> linux-next? > > > > It's already there, right? > > > > Yuk! its there. > > I actually wanted to refer to the 'swap notify patch'. Please see patch titled: > 'ramzswap: Eliminate stale data from compressed memory (v2)' > (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/982232) > > This patch got 3 Acks: Pekka, Linus and Nigel. Yes, I can't take that one, as it is outside of the drivers/staging/ tree. Unless no one else objects? Which, I guess no one does, hm, sorry about that. Care to resend them to me so I can queue them up? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
