Hi, Nitin. First of all, I am sorry for not review your code. Now, I am too busy to review your code. When you send the patch which notify free from swap slot, I thought it's good except one. One thing was about naming. Now block device operations has field naming swap_xxx_notify (I am not sure exact name). My concern was it's very specific about swap. So I thought we would be better to more abstract name. I thought trim like naming as Linus said. Anyway, I will review again at next week if it isn't merged linux-next(or linux-mm ?? which is right?). That's because I have a interest in your good ramzswap. :) Sorry for late response. See you soon. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
