On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 09:13:46PM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote: > Hi Minchan, > > On 05/16/2010 09:50 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > One thing was about naming. > > Now block device operations has field naming swap_xxx_notify > > (I am not sure exact name). My concern was it's very specific about swap. > > So I thought we would be better to more abstract name. > > > > I thought trim like naming as Linus said. > > This call is very swap specific and is quite different from generic trim > stuff. So, I think it will be better not be generalize the name and avoid > confusing it with trim/discard etc. > > > > > Anyway, I will review again at next week if it isn't merged > > linux-next(or linux-mm ?? which is right?). That's because I have a > > interest in your good ramzswap. :) > > > > Thanks, comments/reviews are always welcome :) > > Greg: In the meantime, considering 3 Acks, is it possible to pull it in > linux-next? It's already there, right? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
