KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:51:59 +0530 > Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> David Rientjes wrote: > >> Yes, I prefer 0 as well and had that in a series in the Lost World >> of my earlier memory/RSS controller patches. I feel now that 0 is >> a bit confusing, we don't use 0 to mean unlimited, unless we >> treat the memory.limit_in_bytes value as boolean. 0 is false, >> meaning there is no limit, > 0 is true, which means the limit >> is set and the value is specified to the value read out. > > I prefer 0 than -1, too Remember, that we may use resource counters for other control groups 0 would make ore sense, like for numfile CG. 0 can mean that this group is not allowed to open any files. Treating 0 as unlimited for some CGs and as 0 for others is a mess. > Thanks, > -Kame > > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
