KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:34:00 +0400 > Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Well, no container may have the ULLMAX (or what is it?) bytes >> touched/allocated :) So I don't see any need in a special value. >> > Then, ULLMAX is default value of "not configured cgroup-resource-counter". > > For make things clear for people(including not-hacker-users), > can we have some definition as following ? > -- > #define RES_COUNTER_INIFINITY (~0ULL) > or some nice name Why do we need this at all? We can simply push -1 there and be happy. > Thanks, > -Kame > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
