On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:34:00 +0400 Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, no container may have the ULLMAX (or what is it?) bytes > touched/allocated :) So I don't see any need in a special value. > Then, ULLMAX is default value of "not configured cgroup-resource-counter". For make things clear for people(including not-hacker-users), can we have some definition as following ? -- #define RES_COUNTER_INIFINITY (~0ULL) or some nice name Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
