On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:51:59 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > David Rientjes wrote: > Yes, I prefer 0 as well and had that in a series in the Lost World > of my earlier memory/RSS controller patches. I feel now that 0 is > a bit confusing, we don't use 0 to mean unlimited, unless we > treat the memory.limit_in_bytes value as boolean. 0 is false, > meaning there is no limit, > 0 is true, which means the limit > is set and the value is specified to the value read out. I prefer 0 than -1, too Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
