Kirill Korotaev wrote: > Tejun Heo wrote: >> I thought something like supermount plus some twists or fuse based sysfs >> proxy would fit better. Dunno whether or how uevent and polling stuff >> can work that way tho. Note that sysfs no longer keeps dentries and >> inodes pinned. It might make the shared dentry stuff harder. > > We simply don't share sysfs dentries/inodes between containers. > It's not that frequently used time critical fs to be super-optimized... :) OIC, dentries and inodes are not shared. Good then. Agreed that sysfs doesn't need to be super-optimized as long as big machines aren't penalized too much (both memory and cpu cycle wise). > I don't like the idea with fuse, since sysfs exports kernel-related stuff, > so doing it via user-space would be pain. Yeah, it would be cumbersome to setup but it's also fast and easy to toy with for prototypes at least. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
