Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Kirill. > > Kirill Korotaev wrote: > >>Imho then OpenOVZ approach with multiple sysfs trees is better. >>it allows to use cached dentries with moultiple sysfs mounts >>each having different view. >>It also allows to hide hw-related entries and events from the containers >>and has quite little modifications in the code. > > > I thought something like supermount plus some twists or fuse based sysfs > proxy would fit better. Dunno whether or how uevent and polling stuff > can work that way tho. Note that sysfs no longer keeps dentries and > inodes pinned. It might make the shared dentry stuff harder. We simply don't share sysfs dentries/inodes between containers. It's not that frequently used time critical fs to be super-optimized... :) I don't like the idea with fuse, since sysfs exports kernel-related stuff, so doing it via user-space would be pain. Thanks, Kirill _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers