Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 02:48:10PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Dave Hansen <hansendc@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 19:57 +0200, Benjamin Thery wrote: >> >> /sys/class/net/ ("real" net class) >> >> /sys/class/net-shadow1/ >> >> /sys/class/net-shadow2/ >> > >> > This seems like a nice "quick fix", but do we really want to be hacking >> > sysfs around like this? >> > >> > We have the backing sysfs_* entries that are separate from the vfs >> > entities already. Why can't we simply have different /sys vfsmounts >> > with different views of the backing sysfs_* entries? >> >> So far this has been easier. sysfs is so tightly coupled to the kobject >> tree decoupling them is seriously non-trivial. > > Tejun just decoupled them, that's why this all changed in the -mm tree, > so it might be a whole lot easier to do now. Right. And I was able to simply the code by using more extensively using the improved sysfs_dirent. However we still have kobj->dentry. Which makes a one to many situation tricky. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers