On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 02:48:10PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Dave Hansen <hansendc@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 19:57 +0200, Benjamin Thery wrote:
> >> /sys/class/net/ ("real" net class)
> >> /sys/class/net-shadow1/
> >> /sys/class/net-shadow2/
> >
> > This seems like a nice "quick fix", but do we really want to be hacking
> > sysfs around like this?
> >
> > We have the backing sysfs_* entries that are separate from the vfs
> > entities already. Why can't we simply have different /sys vfsmounts
> > with different views of the backing sysfs_* entries?
>
> So far this has been easier. sysfs is so tightly coupled to the kobject
> tree decoupling them is seriously non-trivial.
Tejun just decoupled them, that's why this all changed in the -mm tree,
so it might be a whole lot easier to do now.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
