Dave Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 20:11 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > >>imho later we will need introduce fs namespace etc. >>at least I see additional fs_namespace which allows to control which >>filesystems are visible >>in the context. And such fs_namespace should be separate from >>mnt_namespace. > > > Could you elaborate on this a bit? I wrote it in another email to Eric: proc-ns, sysfs-ns, printk-ns or syslog-ns?: syslog should be virtualized and more... semi-namespaces: fs-ns (should regulate which filesystems are accessiable from container, but probably this is not exact name space... need to think over...), dev-ns (should regulate which devices are accessiable from container) Kirill
