Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:22:30PM +0200, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>
>>all,
>>
>>'pspace' sounds wrong when you know about the other namespaces :
>>
>>struct nsproxy {
>> atomic_t count;
>> spinlock_t nslock;
>> struct uts_namespace *uts_ns;
>> struct ipc_namespace *ipc_ns;
>> struct user_namespace *user_ns;
>> struct namespace *namespace;
>>};
>>
>>'proc_namespace' might be confusing, what about 'task_namespace' ?
>>
>>'namespace' should probably be renamed to something like 'mnt_namespace' ?
>
>
> what about vfs_namespace?
imho later we will need introduce fs namespace etc.
at least I see additional fs_namespace which allows to control which filesystems are visible
in the context. And such fs_namespace should be separate from mnt_namespace.
Kirill
