On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 5:49 PM Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 4:19 PM Ralph Boehme <slow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> <snip>
> > >> a serious regression in the server (but trivial fix). We are waiting
> > >>
> > >> on someone to merge the oneline fix to the server (which we tested out
> > >>
> > >> ok) from David.
> >
> > no, Ralph.
>
> Oops... Sorry about the typo ...
>
> > fix + test = MR + review = master
> >
> > The test is still missing and I was on vacation and am swamped with work.
>
> All of the standard ("fstest" aka "xfstests") automated tests fail, so
> trivial to test/reproduce. Does anyone have a pointer to the
> smbtorture tests for SMB3.1.1 POSIX? It only needs a single query fs
> info to fail so this looks like only a few line addition to the
> existing SMB3.1.1 POSIX tests. I do badly want to re-enable our
> automated testing to Samba with SMB3.1.1 POSIX (the "buildbot") but
> obviously this blocks every test. We do test on every pull request
> upstream to Samba (and also to Samba with vfs_btrfs for those features
Sorry about another typo:
We do test (cifs.ko) -- to Samba server -- on every pull request
--
Thanks,
Steve
