On 6/10/24 10:53 PM, Steve French wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 3:48 PM Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 15:05 -0500, Steve French wrote: Yes - the reproducer helps. The bug is easy to reproduce. I wanted to verify that the succeeding cases are the same that I see: - works with "cache=none" and - works with "nobrl" and - works with "vers=1.0" All other combinations fail ... Should be straightforward to fix in cifs.ko. Will look at a fix for this later today. Awesome, thanks. Note that the problem with SMB3.1.1 POSIX extensions is a Samba bug - a serious regression in the server (but trivial fix). We are waiting on someone to merge the oneline fix to the server (which we tested out ok) from David.
no, Ralph.
Is there an MR for this? I couldn't find it.I was puzzled why there wasn't a fix immediately applied since it was tested (and could add my Reviewed-by if that helped),
as written before fix + test = MR + review = master The test is still missing and I was on vacation and am swamped with work. Thanks!
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
