On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 02:28:41PM +0000, Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem wrote: > On 23/02/2024 06:14, Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis) > wrote: > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. > > > > > > > Thx. Took a while (among others because the stable team worked a bit > > slower that usual), but from what Paulo Alcantara and Salvatore > > Bonaccorso recently said everything is afaics now fixed or on track to > > be fixed in all affected stable/longterm branches: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZdgyEfNsev8WGIl5@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > If I got this wrong and that's not the case, please holler. > > > > #regzbot resolve: apparently fixed in all affected stable/longterm > > branches with various commits > > #regzbot ignore-activity > > > > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > > -- > > Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: > > https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr > > That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you. > > > > > > We are seeing CIFS mount failures after upgrading from v5.15.148 to > v5.15.149, I have reverted eb3e28c1e8 ("smb3: Replace smb2pdu 1-element > arrays with flex-arrays") and I no longer see the regression. It looks like > the issue is also impacting v5.10.y as the mentioned reverted patch has also > been merged to v5.10.210. I am currently running the CIFS mount test > manually and will update the thread with the exact mount failure error. I > think we should revert eb3e28c1e8 ("smb3: Replace smb2pdu 1-element arrays > with flex-arrays") from both v5.15.y & v5.10.y until we come up with a > proper fix on this versions, please note that if we will take this path then > we will need to re-introduce. b3632baa5045 ("cifs: fix off-by-one in > SMB2_query_info_init()") which has been removed from latest v5.10.y and > v5.15.y releases. > > Please send this as a patch series, in a new thread, so we can properly track this, we have too many different threads here (and the subject line is wrong...) thanks, greg k-h
