On 1/11/21 11:25 AM, Vincent MAILHOL wrote: >> Can I have re-add your S-o-B for "[net-next 10/13] can: length: >> can_skb_get_frame_len(): introduce function to get data length of frame in data >> link layer". If you have any contact to Arunachalam Santhanam, would be good to >> have his ack aswell. IMHO it's not critical, as this is based on your original >> patch. > > I am not fully familiar with the process and I was thinking to > sign it off once all comments were addressed. But if you want to > directly add the sign-off-by in the v2 then yes, go ahead! Signed-off means that it's a open source patch: >> The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the explanation for the >> patch, which certifies that you wrote it or otherwise have the right to >> pass it on as an open-source patch. For details see: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.10/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L361 An OK "once all comments were addressed" is a Acked-by or a Reviewed-by. > I also discussed previously with Arunachalam. He also > acknowledges the changes. So no problem to add his sign > off. Please let me know if he needs to send a message to the > mailing list. Anyhow, I'll send the patch, as is, without your S-o-b and you can both reply and give ne S-o-b and Acked-by :) regards Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
