Re: PCI/PCIe cards and MSI support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Stéphane Grosjean <s.grosjean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PCI/PCIe cards and MSI support
From: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:01:27 +0100
Cc: "linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <DB6PR03MB3093A117F99170BDD81CBC1FD6F40@DB6PR03MB3093.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Mail-followup-to: Stéphane Grosjean <s.grosjean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <DB6PR03MB3093A117F99170BDD81CBC1FD6F40@DB6PR03MB3093.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)

Hey,

> or if the driver can decide to request (resp. free) IRQs when loading (resp. unloading)
> the module?

This seems a bad idea. Loading the module should not allocate resources.
A reasonable point IMHO is the probe of a device.

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- RE: PCI/PCIe cards and MSI support
  - From: Stéphane Grosjean

References:
- PCI/PCIe cards and MSI support
  - From: Stéphane Grosjean

Prev by Date: PCI/PCIe cards and MSI support
Next by Date: Re: Need help in interpreting ip status output
Previous by thread: PCI/PCIe cards and MSI support
Next by thread: RE: PCI/PCIe cards and MSI support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Automotive Discussions] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [CAN Bus]

Powered by Linux