On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:27:02PM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > >> By the way, what is the rationale for this rule that consumers shall > >> depend on rather than select GPIOLIB? > > > > I think consumers should depend on GPIOLIB and producers > > should select GPIOLIB. > > so what do we do here? Should I revert the patch or can I get an updated > patch that uses the agreed upon select vs depends. I've prepared this branch which still needs to be tested & debugged, it contains a patch to change the "select" to a "depends on": https://github.com/l1k/linux/commits/hci_bcm_v2/ https://github.com/l1k/linux/commit/71aa06c610d0 If you prefer reverting 27378f4c1b92 or rebase your branch and drop it, I'll be happy to provide a rectified version instead (basically 27378f4c1b92 and 71aa06c610d0 squashed together). I was assuming that bluetooth-next/master is a non-rebasing branch, hence prepared 71aa06c610d0 as a fix of the existing commit. Thanks, Lukas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
