On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 04:09:01PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > For surprise removals that have already marked the disk dead, there is > no point in calling fsync_bdev as all I/O will fail anyway, so skip it. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > --- > block/genhd.c | 9 ++++++++- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c > index 626c8406f21a6..f68bdfe4f883b 100644 > --- a/block/genhd.c > +++ b/block/genhd.c > @@ -584,7 +584,14 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk) > blk_drop_partitions(disk); blk_drop_partitions() also invokes fsync_bdev() via delete_partition(). So why treat them differently? > mutex_unlock(&disk->open_mutex); > > - fsync_bdev(disk->part0); > + /* > + * If this is not a surprise removal see if there is a file system > + * mounted on this device and sync it (although this won't work for > + * partitions). For surprise removals that have already marked the > + * disk dead skip this call as no I/O is possible anyway. > + */ > + if (!test_bit(GD_DEAD, &disk->state)) > + fsync_bdev(disk->part0); > __invalidate_device(disk->part0, true); > > /* > -- > 2.30.2 >