Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: skip the fsync_bdev call in del_gendisk for surprise removals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/16/22 16:20, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 04:18:43PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
My turn to be picky:
In the previous patch you use 'set_bit()' for GD_DEAD, which to my
knowledge doesn't imply a memory barrier.
Yet here you rely on that for the 'test_bit()' to return the correct/most
recent value.
Don't we need a memory barrier here somewhere?

Well, we only do the test to skip useless work.  A race is not a
problem here.

Ok.

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		           Kernel Storage Architect
hare@xxxxxxx			                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux