On 6/29/19 10:28 AM, Scott Bauer wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 10:26:52AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 6/29/19 10:19 AM, Scott Bauer wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey Jens,
>>>
>>> Can you please stage these for 5.3 aswell?
>>
>> Yes, looks fine to me. But it conflicts with the psid revert in terms
>> of ioctl numbering. You fine with me renumbering IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE to:
>>
>> #define IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE _IOW('p', 233, struct opal_mbr_done)
>
> Sorry for the conflict. That's fine. I'll fix up userland tooling.
Renamed 232 -> 233, and 233 -> 234, for the two conflicts. So now we have:
#define IOC_OPAL_PSID_REVERT_TPR _IOW('p', 232, struct opal_key)
#define IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE _IOW('p', 233, struct opal_mbr_done)
#define IOC_OPAL_WRITE_SHADOW_MBR _IOW('p', 234, struct opal_shadow_mbr)
--
Jens Axboe
