On 6/29/19 10:19 AM, Scott Bauer wrote:
>
> Hey Jens,
>
> Can you please stage these for 5.3 aswell?
Yes, looks fine to me. But it conflicts with the psid revert in terms
of ioctl numbering. You fine with me renumbering IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE to:
#define IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE _IOW('p', 233, struct opal_mbr_done)
--
Jens Axboe
