On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 10:26:52AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/29/19 10:19 AM, Scott Bauer wrote:
> >
> > Hey Jens,
> >
> > Can you please stage these for 5.3 aswell?
>
> Yes, looks fine to me. But it conflicts with the psid revert in terms
> of ioctl numbering. You fine with me renumbering IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE to:
>
> #define IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE _IOW('p', 233, struct opal_mbr_done)
Sorry for the conflict. That's fine. I'll fix up userland tooling.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
