RE: Another bcache hang

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Jason Warr [mailto:jason@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 12:34 PM
>
> I would say it is going to be a better choice for use cases that are
> more dynamic in nature.  By that I mean where you may have a larger
> number of smaller volumes that may have different needs for redundancy
> and/or where you may be adding or removing physical devices often.

Ah, that's true; using raid at the lvm layer allows you to selectively
choose redundancy as opposed to dropping the entire pv on top of an mdraid.

> There are lots of good options that are becoming more viable now that we
> have a real in kernel caching device to mask out allot of previous
> performance concerns.

Continuing to veer off-topic ;), what kernel version are you currently using
with bcache? I was originally thinking of going 3.10LTS, but ended up
installing 3.11 based on the mailing list traffic.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux