Re: Block Size for Windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I just went ahead and backed out the problematic change. Haven't even
tried building the code yet - but if you feel lucky, it's up. I bet it
fixes it.

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Joseph Glanville
> <joseph.glanville@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The issue is probably in fs/bio.c, some of the bio splitting changes
>> could effect md without even having bcache in use.
>>
>> Kent, I will try get a test box up running more recent code then the
>> stuff we run (which doesn't have said issue).
>
> Well, sounds like it's definitively just raid10 that triggers it -
> that helps a lot. I think I know a sure workaround for it now, I'll
> try and upload a new version tomorrow that should fix it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux