On Tue, 13 May 2014 13:45:34 -0700 (PDT) Len Ovens <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 13 May 2014, Peter Lutek wrote: > > > ok... looks like my non-rt kernel gives me a larger list of available > > governors (and, curiously, a lower maximum available CPU speed) than my rt > > kernel, which has only the powersave and performance governors as well as a > > higher max CPU speed. perhaps "performance" on the RT kernel will be best.... > > Hmm, do you have "boost" enabled in your bios? You may wish to turn it off > as non-os control will change speeds on you if temperature gets too high. > That may be why the top speed shows different. Boost is new on the intel > chips, so if your system is even a year old, probably no boost. > > I have not installed an RT kernel since 2.4 or 2.6 as the lowlatency > kernel has allowed me good stable performance and still has all the > drivers I have needed on any of my personal machines I have tested. The > generic kernel is not good enough for me though. > > -- > Len Ovens > www.ovenwerks.net > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user cpufreq-set takes the arguments --min FREQ and --max FREQ which allow you to set the minimum and maximum allowed frequencies for your current scaling governor, though I don't know if fixing the frequency to a given value within the ondemand or performance governors differ anyhow to the userspace setting. Good luck! -- Federico Galland <federicogalland@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
