Re: What is the best MP3 encoder?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/29/2013 03:31 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 06:31:24PM +0100, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
48Khz will not help at all when it comes to artifacts and the raw
material is usually in 44.1 (and sometimes in 96 or 192) anyway.
Speaking about bitrates higher than what the human ear can hear,
here is some cool info about high bit rates:

     http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html

This is highly controversal amongst audio enthusiasts. (Don't mean the
link, just the subject.)

Interesting discussion:
http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/13/03/22/178213/can-you-really-hear-the-difference-between-lossless-lossy-audio


True, it's controversial, but people often mix what is nice with accurate playing, this subject have two sides:

One is the fact that the ear won't hear over 20k, and for most adults (even some younger people this days) 12-16k is max

Despite this, many people are enjoying 60k amps even when the recording is let's say a 44.1. And also vinyl even when the dynamics and frequency range are bad which leads to the second fact: Distortion, bad dynamics, interference and other stuff can sound pleasing.

In my conclusion, one have to respect both sides.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux