Re: What is the best MP3 encoder?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 06:31:24PM +0100, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> 48Khz will not help at all when it comes to artifacts and the raw
> material is usually in 44.1 (and sometimes in 96 or 192) anyway.
> Speaking about bitrates higher than what the human ear can hear,
> here is some cool info about high bit rates:
> 
>     http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html

This is highly controversal amongst audio enthusiasts. (Don't mean the
link, just the subject.)

Interesting discussion:
http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/13/03/22/178213/can-you-really-hear-the-difference-between-lossless-lossy-audio

also on this list, there has been some "discussion"


-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux