On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Chris Bannister <cbannister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
highly controversial in the way that, say, climate change or evolutuon is highly controversial.
on one side, we have a group of people dedicated to measurement, reproduceable results, correct testing methodology, science.
on the other side, we have a group of people dedicated to woo.
that isn't a controversy, it's the endless scream of the stupid in the face of the truth.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 06:31:24PM +0100, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:This is highly controversal amongst audio enthusiasts. (Don't mean the
> 48Khz will not help at all when it comes to artifacts and the raw
> material is usually in 44.1 (and sometimes in 96 or 192) anyway.
> Speaking about bitrates higher than what the human ear can hear,
> here is some cool info about high bit rates:
>
> http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
link, just the subject.)
highly controversial in the way that, say, climate change or evolutuon is highly controversial.
on one side, we have a group of people dedicated to measurement, reproduceable results, correct testing methodology, science.
on the other side, we have a group of people dedicated to woo.
that isn't a controversy, it's the endless scream of the stupid in the face of the truth.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
