On Sat, Nov 3, 2012, at 10:28, Leigh Dyer wrote: > > It's definitely an option, yep, but it's a trade-off -- that means > hosting twice as many files as you'd need otherwise, using twice as much > storage as you'd use otherwise. I've actually done that on my blog, > where I host a few of my own tracks, but when you have millions tracks > to host -- and to re-encode in to a new format -- it's easier said than > done. Yeah that's what I was thinking. By the way, have you guys heard about the official.fm js implementations of flac, mp3, aac and alac, http://labs.official.fm/codecs/ ? That looks promising in principle, as a way to overcome the lack of browser codec support. I tried it briefly though and their demos didn't work smoothly at all, admittedly on a rather slow computer. Michał _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
