Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:41 PM, david <gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rosea.grammostola wrote:
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:34 -1000, david wrote:
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
This musing about "broken" alsa-drivers that need to be "fixed" in the
thread at PA increases the bad feeling about PA's relation and awarenes
to pro-audio.
best regs
HZN
PA is specifically for 'desktop' usage, pro-audio isn't a part of
that. If you're doing pro-audio you'd be running JACK anyway. I
struggle to understand why a user would want PA, with all the inherent
latency concerns (compared to JACK) to control their pro-audio
soundcard.
Perhaps Pulse really just wants to get rid of JACK in the first place?
???
Replace JACK entirely with Pulse, become the only audio server game in town?
;-)
Yeah, world domination is ALWAYS on the agenda I'm sure. Which is why
Pulseaudio automatically suspends its control of a sound card with
jack2 requests control =)
Maybe in some version of PulseAudio you have. The one I used to have
here did not. So I removed it. Simpler that way. I guess I still
consider PulseAudio unnecessary for any purpose.
--
David
gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
