On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:41 PM, david <gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > rosea.grammostola wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:34 -1000, david wrote: >>> >>> Ng Oon-Ee wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This musing about "broken" alsa-drivers that need to be "fixed" in the >>>>> thread at PA increases the bad feeling about PA's relation and awarenes >>>>> to pro-audio. >>>>> >>>>> best regs >>>>> HZN >>>> >>>> PA is specifically for 'desktop' usage, pro-audio isn't a part of >>>> that. If you're doing pro-audio you'd be running JACK anyway. I >>>> struggle to understand why a user would want PA, with all the inherent >>>> latency concerns (compared to JACK) to control their pro-audio >>>> soundcard. >>> >>> Perhaps Pulse really just wants to get rid of JACK in the first place? >> >> ??? > > Replace JACK entirely with Pulse, become the only audio server game in town? > ;-) > Yeah, world domination is ALWAYS on the agenda I'm sure. Which is why Pulseaudio automatically suspends its control of a sound card with jack2 requests control =) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
