Re: perhaps why some of us have more trouble w/ pulseaudio than others (ICE1712/M-audio delta problem w/ pulseaudio)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



rosea.grammostola wrote:
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:34 -1000, david wrote:
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This musing about "broken" alsa-drivers that need to be "fixed" in the
thread at PA increases the bad feeling about PA's relation and awarenes
to pro-audio.

best regs
HZN
PA is specifically for 'desktop' usage, pro-audio isn't a part of
that. If you're doing pro-audio you'd be running JACK anyway. I
struggle to understand why a user would want PA, with all the inherent
latency concerns (compared to JACK) to control their pro-audio
soundcard.
Perhaps Pulse really just wants to get rid of JACK in the first place?

???

Replace JACK entirely with Pulse, become the only audio server game in town? ;-)

--
David
gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux