On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:41 -1000, david wrote: > rosea.grammostola wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:34 -1000, david wrote: > >> Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > >>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> This musing about "broken" alsa-drivers that need to be "fixed" in the > >>>> thread at PA increases the bad feeling about PA's relation and awarenes > >>>> to pro-audio. > >>>> > >>>> best regs > >>>> HZN > >>> PA is specifically for 'desktop' usage, pro-audio isn't a part of > >>> that. If you're doing pro-audio you'd be running JACK anyway. I > >>> struggle to understand why a user would want PA, with all the inherent > >>> latency concerns (compared to JACK) to control their pro-audio > >>> soundcard. > >> Perhaps Pulse really just wants to get rid of JACK in the first place? > > > > ??? > > Replace JACK entirely with Pulse, become the only audio server game in > town? ;-) > Paranoid? ;) No, here Pulse nicely suspends when I start qjackctl and not vice versa... Jack rules here ;) \r _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
