Yeah, tried the patchbay, but I need something that fires up the apps too. I'll try Ladish. thanx On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:01 +0100, rosea grammostola wrote: > rosea grammostola wrote: > > Gerald Mwangi wrote: > >> Hi, I've played arround with LASH, and it seems to do what it was ment > >> for. Hydrogen and Zynadd already support it, and I think Ardour too. So > >> its not about LASH its self, but about the apps that use it. If I were > >> to push LASH developement, it wouldn't change anything. I mean to force > >> audio apps, which use Jack, to use LASH as well. For me it is super > >> important, to be able to save the whole session with one click. There > >> are so many standalone jack apps out there, which I'd like to use for > >> recording. I simply don't rewiring everything that belongs to project > >> everytime I work on it. > > Imho you better could use Ladish then LASH atm. I enjoy using it myself. > > > > http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/apps/all/ladish > > > > You could also take a look into this: > > > > http://digitaldub.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/linux-audio-session-scripting/ > Ow and there is the qjackctl patchbay: > > http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/76 > > > > > There are some proposals for a minimal session handler within Jack. > > It's clear that users needs session handling, it's up to the devs to > > make a good plan for it. I think they understand the need of users now. > > So as a musicians I suggest you to look at the available options, > > choose one and just wait and pray for more and/ or new developments in > > this area. Your point is clear and taken. > > > > \r > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
