rosea grammostola wrote: > Gerald Mwangi wrote: >> Hi, I've played arround with LASH, and it seems to do what it was ment >> for. Hydrogen and Zynadd already support it, and I think Ardour too. So >> its not about LASH its self, but about the apps that use it. If I were >> to push LASH developement, it wouldn't change anything. I mean to force >> audio apps, which use Jack, to use LASH as well. For me it is super >> important, to be able to save the whole session with one click. There >> are so many standalone jack apps out there, which I'd like to use for >> recording. I simply don't rewiring everything that belongs to project >> everytime I work on it. > Imho you better could use Ladish then LASH atm. I enjoy using it myself. > > http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/apps/all/ladish > > You could also take a look into this: > > http://digitaldub.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/linux-audio-session-scripting/ Ow and there is the qjackctl patchbay: http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/76 > > There are some proposals for a minimal session handler within Jack. > It's clear that users needs session handling, it's up to the devs to > make a good plan for it. I think they understand the need of users now. > So as a musicians I suggest you to look at the available options, > choose one and just wait and pray for more and/ or new developments in > this area. Your point is clear and taken. > > \r > > > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
