Hi, I've played arround with LASH, and it seems to do what it was ment for. Hydrogen and Zynadd already support it, and I think Ardour too. So its not about LASH its self, but about the apps that use it. If I were to push LASH developement, it wouldn't change anything. I mean to force audio apps, which use Jack, to use LASH as well. For me it is super important, to be able to save the whole session with one click. There are so many standalone jack apps out there, which I'd like to use for recording. I simply don't rewiring everything that belongs to project everytime I work on it. To get specific, say you have a project with Ardour, Hydrogen, Rosegarden, 3x Zynadd, 5x freqtweak. Since the last 2 aren't available as plugins (what's the status of zynjack, it seems abandoned), you 11 apps! This setup seems crazy, but freqtweak is soooo cool, I'd like to use multiple instances as inserts in ardour. I just don't feel like firing 11 apps, and wiring them everytime. Gerald On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 14:20 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote: > If you can finance LASH development by giving jobs to 2-3 dedicated > coders - it might be a good way to force it. Other than that I am not > sure. > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Gerald Mwangi <gerald.mwangi@xxxxxx> > wrote: > Hi, maybe you can enlighten me on the alternatives. > It just seems to me that the majority of audio devs, simply > don't seem > to care about session management. So my idea is just to force > them to. > Gerald > > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:47 +0300, alex stone wrote: > > > > > I disagree with LASH inclusion in jack itself. > > There is work going to consider alternatives at the moment. > > > > Alex. > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > Linux-audio-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev > > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
