Gerald Mwangi wrote: > Hi, I've played arround with LASH, and it seems to do what it was ment > for. Hydrogen and Zynadd already support it, and I think Ardour too. So > its not about LASH its self, but about the apps that use it. If I were > to push LASH developement, it wouldn't change anything. I mean to force > audio apps, which use Jack, to use LASH as well. For me it is super > important, to be able to save the whole session with one click. There > are so many standalone jack apps out there, which I'd like to use for > recording. I simply don't rewiring everything that belongs to project > everytime I work on it. Imho you better could use Ladish then LASH atm. I enjoy using it myself. http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/apps/all/ladish You could also take a look into this: http://digitaldub.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/linux-audio-session-scripting/ There are some proposals for a minimal session handler within Jack. It's clear that users needs session handling, it's up to the devs to make a good plan for it. I think they understand the need of users now. So as a musicians I suggest you to look at the available options, choose one and just wait and pray for more and/ or new developments in this area. Your point is clear and taken. \r _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
