Ray Rashif wrote:
> 2009/9/7 Ray Rashif <schivmeister@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:schivmeister@xxxxxxxxx>>
A few years ago I had trouble in booting a Linux box that did not have>
> JFS is low-latency, low-power, and all-around performer. As such, it
> suits a mobile platform with 5400RPM disks.
>
>
> Oops, forgot to continue:
>
> For speedier and larger disks, ext3/4. Both XFS and ReiserFS have their
> cons. Google and you'll land upon a pretty old review, but JFS and EXT3
> come up ahead of the others.
Ext2 or Ext3 for the file system. True, I wasn't using a specific
/boot partition, just a / partition.
Can you now boot with a / partition in something other than Ext2 or
Ext3? Or is the approach to use a /boot partition in Ext2 or Ext3,
and then use whatever file system you want for / and the rest of the
partitions?
Best,
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Yes, it might've been an issue in the past. Even /boot now is alright with NTFS!
With that said, however, either leave everything on one and the same format, or use a non-journalled fs on /boot. Why? Because a journalled fs on /boot does nothing and is wasted.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
