Re: Ext3 or JFS (or other) for linux audio?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Ext3 or JFS (or other) for linux audio?
From: Ray Rashif <schivmeister@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:18:44 +0800
In-reply-to: <200909070858.47967.jostein@xxxxxxx>

JFS is low-latency, low-power, and all-around performer. As such, it suits a mobile platform with 5400RPM disks.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ext3 or JFS (or other) for linux audio?
  - From: Ray Rashif

References:
- Ext3 or JFS (or other) for linux audio?
  - From: Ken Restivo
- Re: Ext3 or JFS (or other) for linux audio?
  - From: Jostein Chr. Andersen

Prev by Date: MIDI over ethernet
Next by Date: Re: Ext3 or JFS (or other) for linux audio?
Previous by thread: Re: Ext3 or JFS (or other) for linux audio?
Next by thread: Re: Ext3 or JFS (or other) for linux audio?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux