Re: Ext3 or JFS (or other) for linux audio?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/9/7 Ray Rashif <schivmeister@xxxxxxxxx>
JFS is low-latency, low-power, and all-around performer. As such, it suits a mobile platform with 5400RPM disks.

Oops, forgot to continue:

For speedier and larger disks, ext3/4. Both XFS and ReiserFS have their cons. Google and you'll land upon a pretty old review, but JFS and EXT3 come up ahead of the others.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux