On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:22:52PM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote: > 2009/9/7 Ray Rashif <schivmeister@xxxxxxxxx> > > > JFS is low-latency, low-power, and all-around performer. As such, it suits > > a mobile platform with 5400RPM disks. > > > > Oops, forgot to continue: > > For speedier and larger disks, ext3/4. Both XFS and ReiserFS have their > cons. Google and you'll land upon a pretty old review, but JFS and EXT3 come > up ahead of the others. Hmm. Well the drive I put into my Core2Duo 2.33Ghz laptop is faster than 5400RPM, but it is also PATA. And it's a single partition and so EXT3 it is. I don't intend to reformat it anytime soon. The disk I'm discussing formatting is an external WD "MyBook" 1TB drive. It will be connected via ESATA to a headless 64-bit 1.2Ghz ITX box, or via FireWire to the laptop. So I guess the filesystem might not be the bottlenack anyway. Keeping it simple: tried and true EXT3. -ken _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
