Ray Rashif wrote: > 2009/9/7 Ray Rashif <schivmeister@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:schivmeister@xxxxxxxxx>> > > JFS is low-latency, low-power, and all-around performer. As such, it > suits a mobile platform with 5400RPM disks. > > > Oops, forgot to continue: > > For speedier and larger disks, ext3/4. Both XFS and ReiserFS have their > cons. Google and you'll land upon a pretty old review, but JFS and EXT3 > come up ahead of the others. A few years ago I had trouble in booting a Linux box that did not have Ext2 or Ext3 for the file system. True, I wasn't using a specific /boot partition, just a / partition. Can you now boot with a / partition in something other than Ext2 or Ext3? Or is the approach to use a /boot partition in Ext2 or Ext3, and then use whatever file system you want for / and the rest of the partitions? Best, Stephen. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
