schoappied wrote: > Mysth-R wrote: > >> And advice other >> people to use it, cause I have the idea that not many people now about >> the existence of LASH.... >> >> >> Yes because not many softwares provide this option :) >> Perhaps making more advertising around LASH could moves things ? >> >> Mysth-R >> >> > the well known circle ;) > > I think not all the developers of the linux audio apps will follow and > read the LAU mailinglist.. So you should post a message/ question for > lash support on their mailinglist.... > _______________________________________________ > > Ok, I made the first step and mailed to the Rosegarden mailinglist, with the LASH question.... This was his answer: On Sunday 13 April 2008, schoappied wrote: > > There is LASH support for seq24 and Muse, so I is and possible and > > usable! Would be great to see it in Rosegarden too. > Assuming that depending on liblash is an indication of LASH support, then MusE has it, and Rosegarden does not. I think that's probably true anyway, and this just all but confirms it. The way things are running these days, I think LASH support would require an interested third party coming aboard to implement and debug it. Somebody who already knows all about LASH, and who really cares about bringing LASH to Rosegarden. If you wait for one of us to do this, I doubt it will ever happen. -- D. Michael McIntyre We're searching for people who really wants to make LASH supported by Rosegarden....! Thanks in advance, Dirk _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
