LASH?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Linux audio-user,

I'm not a developer but a user who wants to know why certain things in 
open source are what they are.

I want to know why LASH is unsupported by so many programms. Mostly sad 
for the "big" programms like Ardour, Rosegarden, Linuxsampler and all 
these...

JACK is a superior concept and nearly all programms happily integrated a 
Jack client.

In my opinion LASH is a same fundamental concept to connect the "one 
function - one programm" philosophy to an audio workspace, like JACK 
already does.

So why is there so low interest in LASH?

Nils
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux